Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°ü°ñ °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ¿¬±¸

A CLINICAL STUDY ON ZYGOMATIC BONE FRACTURE

¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À¯¼±¿­ Á¤Çö/¹Ú¼¼Âù/¿ÀÀ¯±Ù/¹ÚÈïÁÖ/¼Ò±¤¼·/Á¶¿ë±â/¿ÀÈñ±Õ/À¯¼±¿­

Abstract

¿ä¾à
1992³â 1¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ 1996³â 12¿ù 31ÀϱîÁö º»°ú¿¡ ÀÔ¿øÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚÁß ÃßÀûÀÌ °¡´É
ÇÑ °ü°ñ °ñÀý ȯÀÚ 164¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀû, ÀÓ»óÅë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº
°á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
°ü°ñ °ñÀý ȯÀÚÀÇ ¿¬·É ºÐÆ÷ÀÇ ¹üÀ§´Â 8¼¼ºÎÅÍ 78¼¼±îÁö·Î Æò±Õ¿¬·ÉÀº 35.6¼¼¿´°í, ¼ºº°
ºÐÆ÷´Â 7:1·Î ³²¼º¿¡¼­ È£¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ùº°·Î´Â 10¿ù(14.0%)°ú 8¿ù(11.6%)¿¡ ¸¹¾Ò°í °èÀýº°·Î
´Â °¡À»(31.1%), ¿©¸§(25.6%), °Ü¿ï(23.2%), º½(20.1%)ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù. ¹ß»ý½Ã°¢º° ºÐÆ÷´Â 21¡­
24½Ã(34.2%)¿Í 1¡­4½Ã(21.3%)¿¡ ¸¹¾Ò°í, ¿øÀκ°·Î´Â ±³Åë»ç°í(53.7%)°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹Àº ºÐÆ÷¸¦
º¸¿´´Ù. °ü°ñ °ñÀýÀÇ ºÐ·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÐÆ÷´Â class ¥³(33.5%)¿Í class ¥²(25.6%)°¡ ¸¹¾Ò°í, µ¿¹Ý
µÈ ¾È¸éºÎ °ñÀýÀº 164¸íÁß 114¸í(69.5%)¿¡¼­ 147·Ê°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ±×Áß »ó¾Ç°ñ °ñÀýÀÌ
52.4%·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ³»¿ø ¹æ¹ýÀº ÀÀ±Þ½ÇÀ» ÅëÇØ ³»¿øÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ 72.3%, ¿Ü·¡¸¦ ÅëÇØ ³»¿ø
ÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ 26.8%¿´À¸¸ç, Ÿ°ú¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼Õ»óÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì´Â37.2%¿´´Ù. ¼ö»óÈÄ ¼ö¼úÀ» ¹ÞÀ»
¶§±îÁö °æ°úµÈ ½Ã°£Àº 5ÀÏ À̳»°¡ 36.6%·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Á¢±Ù¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â ±¸³» Àý°³ ¹ý
(57.1%)°ú ´«½çÀý°³ ¹ý(38.4%)ÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼úÈÄ ÇÕº´ÁõÀ¸·Î´Â ¾È±¸ ÇÔ¸ôÁõ(7.3%),
¾È¸ð ºñ´ë (6.7%), °¨°¢ÀúÇÏ(6.1%), º¹½Ã(2.4%) µîÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ °ü°ñ °ñÀý½Ã¿¡´Â °ñÀýÀÇ Á¤µµ¿Í µ¿¹Ý °ñÀý ¹× ¿¬°ü ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤È®ÇÑ
Áø´Ü°ú Ä¡·á°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°í Ÿ°ú¿ÍÀÇ À¯±âÀûÀÎ ÇùÁ¶ÇÏ¿¡ ÀûÀýÇÑ Ã³Ä¡¸¦ ÇØÁÜÀ¸·Î½á ¼úÈÄ ÇÕº´
ÁõÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸®¶ó »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

This study was based on a series of 164 patients with zygomatic bone fracture
treated at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Chonnam university Hospital
from January 1992 to December 1996.
The male-to-female ratio was 7 : 1. Their ages ranged from 8 to 78 years, with a
median age of 35.6 years. The age frequency was highest in the second decade (30.5%),
and third decade (23.8%), fifth decade (16.5%) in orders. The monthly distrbution of
incidence showed October to be month in which the greatest percentage occurred(14.0%).
The major cause of zygomatic bone fracture was alleged traffic accidents (53.7%). The
incidence of concomitant facial bone fractures was 69.5%, and maxilla fracture (52.4%)
was most frequently combined. The admission route was through emergency room
(72.3%) and through outpatient department (26.8%). The incidence of associated injuries
was 37.2%. The intraoral approach was the major method of treatment in zygomatic
bone fracture (57.1%). The most frequent type of zygoma fracture was class ¥³ (33.5%),
and class ¥² (25.6%) was next in order of frequency. Complications were enophthalmos
(7.3%), facial asymmetry (6.7%), paresthesia (6.1%), and diplopia(2.4%).
These results suggest that correct diagnosis and treatment of severity of fracture,
concomitant fracture, and associated injuries are necessary, and co-operative treatment
with medical department should be performed to reduce postoperative complication.

Å°¿öµå

zygoma bone fracture@clinical study;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed